Wikipedia

This text was copied from Wikipedia on 13 November 2024 at 5:10AM.

John Blenkinsop's pioneering locomotive pulling several chaldrons (1813).
Chaldron waggon at Beamish. The long brake lever is for control when running down to the staith by gravity. Note that the perspective of this photo makes the chaldron seem much larger than it is.

A chaldron (also chauldron or chalder) was an English measure of dry volume, mostly used for coal; the word itself is an obsolete spelling of cauldron. It was used from the 13th century onwards, nominally until 1963, when it was abolished by the Weights and Measures Act 1963, but in practice until the end of 1835, when the Weights and Measures Act 1835 specified that thenceforth coal could only be sold by weight.

Coal

The chaldron was used as the measure for coal from the 13th century, measuring by volume being much more practical than weighing low-value, high-bulk commodities like coal. It was not standardized, and there were many different regional chaldrons, the two most important being the Newcastle and London chaldrons. The Newcastle chaldron was used to measure all coal shipped from Northumberland and Durham, and the London chaldron became the standard measure for coal in the east and south of England.[1]

Many attempts have been made to calculate the weight of a Newcastle chaldron as used in medieval and early modern times. Coal industry historian John Nef has estimated that in 1421 it weighed 2,000 lb (907 kg), and that its weight was gradually increased by coal traders due to the taxes on coal (which were charged per chaldron) until 1678, when its weight was fixed by law at 52+12 long hundredweight (5,880 lb; 2,670 kg), later increased in 1694 to 53 long hundredweight (5,940 lb; 2,690 kg).[1]

A London chaldron, on the other hand, was defined as "36 bushels heaped up, each bushel to contain a Winchester bushel and 1 imperial quart (1.14 L; 1.20 US qt), and to be 19+12 inches (495 mm) in diameter". This approximated a weight in coal of around 28 long hundredweight or 3,140 lb or 1,420 kg.[2]

The chaldron was the legal limit for horse-drawn coal waggons travelling by road as it was considered that heavier loads would cause too much damage to the roadways. Railways had standard "chauldron waggons" which were about 10 ft (3.05 m) and around 6 ft 3 in (1.91 m) high.

The value of a chaldron of coal depended on the size of the lumps of coal and also their water content. Unscrupulous merchants would purchase their coal in lumps as large as possible then sell them in smaller sizes. This was abolished by the Weights and Measures Act 1835, which legislated that from January 1836 coal was only to be sold by weight.[3]

See also

References

Notes
  1. ^ a b Ashworth, William; Mark Pegg (1986). The history of the British coal industry. Oxford University Press. pp. 559–560. ISBN 0-19-828282-6.
  2. ^ Hutton, Charles (1815). A Philosophical and Mathematical Dictionary. the Author. p. 302.
  3. ^ William J. Ashworth, Charles (2003). Customs and Excise. Oxford University Press. p. 289. ISBN 0-19-925921-6.
Sources

Public Domain This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainChambers, Ephraim, ed. (1728). "Chaldron". Cyclopædia, or an Universal Dictionary of Arts and Sciences (1st ed.). James and John Knapton, et al.

7 Annotations

First Reading

Michael Robinson  •  Link

Chaldron (measure).
From the Latin caldaria, a caldron, M.F. chaldere, a kettle or pot, M.E. chalder, chaldre. Originally pronounced chalder, later chaldron, although in some areas the older pronunciation was still used in the 19th century.

A measure of capacity for coal, coke and grain which was used in England, Scotland and Wales. In use before the 15th century the standard chaldron of coal was first regulated in 1421 under Henry V, at 32 'bushels', totalling 1 'ton' of 2000lb (907·180kg) and was equal to one twentieth of a 'keel' or 'barge load' of 20 tons ( ). This applied every where except Newcastle upon Tyne, where the chaldron totalled 42 cwt and equalled 1/8 of a 'keel'. Taxes of 2d (1p) per chaldron were calculated as it was loaded aboard ship. By the late 18th century, to avoid tax revenues, the size of the regular chaldron had increased by 240 Lbs. ( ). and the Newcastle chaldron by 1232 Lbs. ( ).

1590 A chaldron of sea coals was 12 'sacks' each containing 4 heaped 'bushels'.

1615. A measure of 32 bushels; when used for coal it was 36 bushels. 138.

1635 Shields, Scotland the chaldron consisted of three 'wain' load and cost 7s. (35p). 122

1676-77 the chaldron was increased to 36 heaped 'bushels' totalling 1 ton ( ) of 2240lb (1016·040kg) or 20 cwt ( ) of 120lb each. The Newcastle chaldron, was a measure containing 53 cwt of coal. The size of a 'chaldron wagon' was (Custom House measurement) was 217·989 cubic ft. and the size of a 'boll', being 976·989 cubic ins. Therefore the chaldron was equal to 22·526 'bolls'. The weight of the 'boll' of coals was 2·35284 cwt ( ). The London chaldron consisted of 36 'bushels' heaped up, each 'bushel' to contain a 'Winchester bushel'. One 'quart' was to be 19½ ins. in diameter externally. It was found by repeated trials that 15 'London Pool Chaldrons' were equal to 8 'Newcastle chaldrons', (Rees's Cyclopedia). Therefore the 'London chaldron' must have equalled 28·266 cwt ( ). Various other estimates were also stated for the 'London chaldron'.

1708 the chaldron contained 36 'bushels'.

1789 Beaument's Treatise on the Coal Trade, 28·266 cwt ( ).

1793 Dr. MacNab, Letters to Pitt. 27·000 cwt ( ).

1829 W. Dickson, Evidence on the Coal Trade. 26·500 cwt ( ).

1847 B. Thompson, Inventions and Improvements 28·462 cwt ( )

http://website.lineone.net/~coalm…

"Numerous measurement units were used by the London trade Coal was loaded in the north using the Newcastle chaldron (NCh) - a weight measure, whereas it was unloaded in London using a volumetric measure - the London chaldron (LCh). The LCh was defined as 36 coal bushels, but there was no consensus on exactly how much quantity was contained in this measure. Modern and contemporary estimates have ranged from 288 to 396 gallons, or from 25.7 cwt to 28.5 cwt when measured by weight."

Aashish Velkar, 'Market Transparency, Uniform Measurements and Standardized Quantities: Institutional Change in 19th Century Britain'
www.ehs.org.uk/ehs/conference2007…

Cumsalisgrano  •  Link

The above and the Two URL's below indicate the " why there was great need" for Standards and means and 'weigh[t]s' to enforce them.

The price of a lump of cole be what the customer would put up with and was able to pay .
Caveat emptor at work.
Another factor at work was that coles would have none stardard specific gravities as qualities be very un even.
http://www.pepysdiary.com/diary/1…

http://www.pepysdiary.com/diary/1…

Second Reading

Bill  •  Link

CHALDER / CHALRON, a quantity of coals containing 36 bushels heaped up, London measure, and 72 at Newcastle.
---An Universal Etymological English Dictionary. N. Bailey, 1675.

Third Reading

San Diego Sarah  •  Link

In the 17th century most coal was taken from small and shallow "bell pits". Pits were often on common land and run by small groups of families. These families worked in teams. Hewers used a pick or crowbar to remove the coal from the seam while women and children carried the coal to the surface. Pits seldom employed more than 40 of 50 miners and often less than 20. (1)
(1) J. F. C. Harrison, The Common People (1984) page 143

As surface deposits became exhausted, coal miners were forced to go deeper into the ground. One of the major problems of mining for coal in the 17th and 18th centuries was flooding. Colliery owners used several different methods to solve this problem. These included pumps worked by windmills and teams of men and animals carrying endless buckets of water. (2)
(2) John S. Allen, Thomas Newcomen : Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (2004-2014)

Thomas Newcomen worked on developing a machine to pump water out of the mines. He eventually came up with the idea of a machine that would rely on atmospheric air pressure to work the pumps, a system which would be safe, if rather slow. The "steam entered a cylinder and raised a piston; a jet of water cooled the cylinder, and the steam condensed, causing the piston to fall, and thereby lift water." (3)
(3) Charles R. Morris, The Dawn of Innovation: The First American Industrial Revolution (2014) page 42

Of course, conditions only got worse when the water pumps arrived -- for a complete history of coal mining and the associated child labor laws, see
https://spartacus-educational.com…

@@@

Queen Elizabeth freed the last English serfs in 1574. But serfdom remained in Scotland until the Colliers and Salters (Scotland) Act 1775 prevented the creation of the status, and 1799, when coal miners who had been kept in serfdom prior to the 1775 Act gained emancipation. However, most Scottish serfs had been freed by then.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/His…

San Diego Sarah  •  Link

Talking about weights and measures -- trying to regulate this goes back to the Romans:

Everyday terms may boggle the mind: For example, why is “pound” abbreviated as “lb”? It’s not an easy one to decipher on its own, because the word and its abbreviation don’t share a single letter.
There is an answer as to why it’s shortened that way, and it dates back to ancient Rome.

The Romans used a basic unit of weight called a libra (~0.722 lbs), derived from the Latin for “scale” or “balance.” Libra pondo is a Latin phrase that translates to “a pound by weight.”
When these terms reached Britain, they became the standard for weighing gold and silver.
The abbreviation “lb” is a shortening of libra that was carried over to the English word “pound.”

The British currency is also called the pound, and the £ symbol represents libra.

Another concept worth mentioning is the Roman uncia, a Latin word that translates to “one-twelfth.” It was used by the Romans as a unit of measurement for one-twelfth of a libra, and it became the inspiration for the English word “ounce.”

So, where did that “z” in the abbreviation “oz” come from?
On the journey from Latin to English, there was a detour with the Italian word onza.
https://wordsmarts.com/pound-abbr…

San Diego Sarah  •  Link

We don't page an Encyclopedia page for coal, so this brief history of its importance to the growth of London is going here:

On 30 September, 2024, the UK switched off its last coal-fired power station. From now on, no mains electricity will be generated in this country from the burning of coal. It’s a big step in the drive towards green energy.

We’ve been generating electricity from coal for over 140 years. The first coal-fired plant in the world opened right here in London in 1882, when Thomas Edison lit up Holborn Viaduct from a nearby coal generator. ...

Given that not a gram of coal was ever mined from the bowels of London, it is surprising just how important the substance has been to the city’s development. One could almost rewrite London’s history from the perspective of this calorific rock. It has provided warmth and light to generations of Londoners. At the same time, its soot begrimed our buildings and shortened the lives of thousands if not millions of Londoners, who inhaled the irritant particulates. Oh, and that whole climate change thing too, obviously.

Many of our most famous landmarks would not have been possible without coal. ... But without the tax on coal we might not have seen St. Paul’s Cathedral or the Embankment take shape.
Coal ended the Great Stink and vanquished cholera, by powering the steam engines that removed sewage and circulated fresh water.
It brought us the railways, which reshaped London, and society, like no other technology.

Without coal, there would be no Bert the chimneysweep.

The countless ways in which coal has shaped the capital is a huge topic. It could fill a book. So rather than publish an overly long essay I [The
Londonist: Time Machine] thought I’d get my hands dirty and put together this sooty graphic.

Follow the billows of smoke to discover the myriad ways in which London was built on coal:
https://londonist.substack.com/p/…

[It's very informative, but can't be duplicated here -- SDS]

Log in to post an annotation.

If you don't have an account, then register here.

References

Chart showing the number of references in each month of the diary’s entries.

1661

1664

1666

  • Dec

1667