I too believe that Mrs Turner is not the culprit in fouling the house of office.
How unfortunate that due to misinterpretation, an individual could run the risk of erroneously being remembered some 356 years later for the 1660s equivalent of "speckling the bowl" at Chez Pepys.
Comments
Second Reading
About Wednesday 21 December 1664
R.A. Lucas • Link
I too believe that Mrs Turner is not the culprit in fouling the house of office.
How unfortunate that due to misinterpretation, an individual could run the risk of erroneously being remembered some 356 years later for the 1660s equivalent of "speckling the bowl" at Chez Pepys.