Annotations and comments

Terry Foreman has posted 16,447 annotations/comments since 28 June 2005.

Comments

First Reading

About Tuesday 29 July 1662

Terry F.  •  Link

"I broached the business of our being abused about flags, which I know doth trouble Sir W. Batten, but I care not."

L&M note: "The flag-makers were over-charging: below [ 13 August ]. John Young, a principal contractor, was a friend of Batten, and served later as an overseer of his will." Sam's quarrel as a proleptic Sir W.B., R.I.P.; also see Pauline's background post on John Young (b)
http://www.pepysdiary.com/encyclo…

Batten's response to this ambush seems to be what Sam awaits with relish: besides his known growing mastery of the nitty-gritty details of the affairs at the docks and yards at Deptford and Woolwich, his reading Hollond is probably not a secret; I wonder if his ace will prove to be his re-reading & annotating -- his superior understanding -- of the Duke's formal charge to the Naval Office ("Instructions").

About Monday 28 July 1662

Terry F.  •  Link

"in the evening Cooper comes, and he being gone, to my chamber a little troubled and melancholy, to my lute late,..."

What a juxtaposition! Mathematiques, a lute and "Melancholy Baby": a short read of Robert Burton's The Anatomy of Melancholy (1632)
http://www.wsu.edu:8080/~rlblair/…

About Monday 28 July 1662

Terry F.  •  Link

L&M note refers to 5 February; Mary on The duke's Institucions.

“There's a long note here by L&M. These instructions (largely stereotyped) were issued by every High Admiral at the start of his term of office. The Instructions of 1662 (based largely on those of 1640) remained substantially in force until Nelson's day. Pepys preseved two Mss copies of them .

“Officially the Navy Board could only act within the terms so established or by obtaining a special warrant for additional powers, but in practice there tended to be more flexibility than this.”
http://www.pepysdiary.com/diary/1…
Sam goes back to the basics; thanks, Mary.

About Monday 28 July 1662

Terry F.  •  Link

"...all the morning abstracting the Duke's instructions in the margin thereof.”

Pray, tell what instructions these be? Searching, I find some 26 days ago (pre-deluge, &c.) consistent with Sam’s interests in the Ropeyard at Woolwich, and his reading of Mr. Holland [Hollond’s] discourse of the Navy” and its “diseases” three days ago: those being “such instructions as concern the officers of the Yard” of 2 July: http://www.pepysdiary.com/diary/1…
(Just a not entirely uneducated guess.)

About Saturday 26 July 1662

Terry F.  •  Link

Jeannine's "Epilogue" -- with splicing -- belongs somehow with the original narrative (my view), but not as a Comment.

About Saturday 26 July 1662

Terry F.  •  Link

"...baptism is only supposed to be done once..."

This is true perhaps of the churches that practice infant baptism, whose adherents are the preponderance of Christians globally -- Catholics and the Protestants of the "Dynastic" (C of E) and "Magisterial" (Lutheran & Calvinist) Reformations.

However, Michael L, those of the "Radical" Reformation practice only "believers' baptism" of those who have reached the "age of discretion" and make their own "profession of faith." This is practiced notably by Baptists (the largest US Protestant family today), who stem from 17c English separatists who found in Holland the like-minded Mennonites, refugees from Bohemia and a species of "Anabaptists" = "Again-baptizers". so-called because the first generation, believing Scripture authorized only "believers' baptism," had themselves been baptized as infants, and so they underwent a second, "true" baptism -- and this persists for some adult "baptized" converts. Nor do the the Holiness/Pentecostal Movements practice infant baptism, presently the fastest-growing Christian groups, globally.

About Saturday 26 July 1662

Terry F.  •  Link

It occurs to me that the model ship posted by GrahamT is probably accessible only to those who are members of the "Pepys Diary Discussion" SmartGroup; but that is an incentive for those who do not yet belong to do so -- it's free, painless and rewarding: http://www.smartgroups.com/group/…

About Saturday 26 July 1662

Terry F.  •  Link

Jeannine, thank you for the moving Epilogue to a very fine, shocking and devastating narrative.

About Saturday 26 July 1662

Terry F.  •  Link

Further actions on/in whichever court: mixed doubles; tag-team; changing partners; 40-love; individual and national dignities at stake...at stake...at the stake....

About Saturday 26 July 1662

Terry F.  •  Link

Add to post about the garden returned to a tennis court: offstage event in synch with with events occurring in The Bedchamber, By Jeannine Kerwin -- grand read, for which thank you very much, Jeannine (aided by Pedro): back-and-forth; changes of service; temper-tantrums; stalking off the court; flacks; clacks; humiliation; careers on the lin. There are losers -- but are there any winners in the long run?

About Saturday 26 July 1662

Terry F.  •  Link

17c recycling.
"The garden had in turn been made from an older tennis court ('The Brake') in the 1650s.”

About Saturday 26 July 1662

Terry F.  •  Link

"my Lord hath lost the garden to his lodgings, and that it is turning into a tennis-court"

L&M note: "The garden had in turn been made from an older tennis court ('The Brake') in the 1650s. (R).

About Anthony Deane

Terry F.  •  Link

From Assistant-Shipwright under Christopher Pett at Woolwich in 1662, "Anthony Deane rose to become Master-Shipwright (Portsmouth) in 1668, and Navy Commissioner and knight in 1675....The 30 ships he built under the act of 1677 Pepys regarded as the best in the world: Naval Minutes, p. 227." L&M, iii.170.n.1.

A short biography of Sir Anthony Deane
http://www.rina.org.uk/showarticl…

Portrait of Sir Anthony Deane
http://www.nmm.ac.uk/mag/pages/mn…

About Friday 25 July 1662

Terry F.  •  Link

Thanks, Australian Susan: I wanted to recall to us one of Sam's first experiences of the fruits of going beyond guidance to the "mastery" to which Xjy rightly refers, and how it is whown at the start of this day.
And thank you, A.S., for *your* post on the wives and the Portsmouth trip: contra what some said then, as I recall, Sam wasn't planning a tryst at all (or at least primarily).