Wikipedia
This text was copied from Wikipedia on 6 November 2024 at 4:10AM.
Samuel Hartlib or Hartlieb (c. 1600 – 10 March 1662)[1] was a Polish born, English educational and agricultural reformer of German-Polish origin[2] who settled, married and died in England. He was a son of George Hartlib, a Pole, and Elizabeth Langthon, a daughter of a rich English merchant.[3] Hartlib was a noted promoter and writer in fields that included science, medicine, agriculture, politics and education. He was a contemporary of Robert Boyle, whom he knew well, and a neighbour of Samuel Pepys in Axe Yard, London, in the early 1660s. He studied briefly at the University of Cambridge upon arriving in England.
"Intelligencer"
Hartlib is often described as an "intelligencer", and indeed has been called "the Great Intelligencer of Europe".[4] His main aim in life was to further knowledge. He kept in touch with an array of contacts from high philosophers to gentleman farmers. He maintained a voluminous correspondence, lost in 1667, but much recovered since 1945;[5] it is housed in a special Hartlib collection at the University of Sheffield, England.
Hartlib became one of the best-connected intellectual figures of the Commonwealth era. He was responsible for patents, spreading information and fostering learning. He circulated designs for calculators, double-writing instruments, seed machines and siege engines. His letters in German, Latin, English and other languages have been subjected to close modern scholarship.
Hartlib set out with a universalist goal: "to record all human knowledge and to make it universally available for the education of all mankind".[6] His work has been compared to modern internet search engines.[7]
Life
Hartlib was born in Elbląg (Elbing), Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. His mother was the daughter of a rich English merchant in Gdańsk (Danzig). His father was a Polish refugee merchant.[8][3] He studied at the Gymnasium in Brzeg and at the Albertina. He went on to Herborn Academy, where he studied under Johannes Heinrich Alsted and Johannes Bisterfeld.[9] Although briefly at the University of Cambridge, supported by John Preston,[10] he does not seem to have formally studied there.[11]
Hartlib met the Scottish preacher John Dury in 1628. In the same year, Hartlib relocated to England, faced with the prospect of being caught in a war zone, as Imperial armies moved into the western parts of Poland and the chance of intervention by Sweden grew.[12][13] He first unsuccessfully set up a school in Chichester, in line with his theories of education, and in 1630 moved permanently to London, living in Duke's Place, Holborn.[14] An early patron was John Williams, the Bishop of Lincoln, who was leading the clerical opposition to Archbishop William Laud.[15] Another supporter was John Pym; Pym would use Hartlib later, as a go-between with Dutch Calvinists in London, in an effort to dig up evidence against Laud.[16][17] Hugh Trevor-Roper argues in his essay Three Foreigners (referring to Hartlib, Dury and the absent Comenius) that Hartlib and the others were the "philosophers" of the "country party" or anti-court grouping of the 1630s and early 1640s, united in their support for these outside voices if agreeing on little else.[18][19]
During the Civil War, Hartlib occupied himself with the peaceful study of agriculture, publishing various works of his own and printing at his own expense several treatises by others on the subject. He planned a school for the sons of gentlemen, to be conducted on new principles, and this probably was the occasion of his friend John Milton's Tractate on Education, addressed to him in 1644, and of William Petty's Two Letters on the same subject, in 1647 and 1648.[20] Another associate in that period was Walter Blith, a noted writer on husbandry.[1]
For his various labours, Hartlib received a pension of £100 from Oliver Cromwell, afterwards increased to £300, as he had spent all his fortune on his experiments. But Hartlib died in poverty: Samuel Pepys in 1660 noted that Hartlib's daughter Nan was penniless.[21] His association with Oliver Cromwell and the Commonwealth resulted in him being sidelined after Charles II's Restoration. He lost his pension, which had already fallen into arrears. Some of his correspondents went so far as to ask for their letters from his archive, fearing they could be compromised by them.[8][22]
Family
In 1629 Hartlib married Mary Burmingham, daughter of Philip Burmingham; she died about 1660. They had at least six children. His family life is rather poorly documented: one useful source is the Diary of Samuel Pepys, as Pepys was a close neighbour of the Hartlib family in Axe Yard in the early 1660s and a friend of Hartlib's son Samuel Jr, a clerk in government service.[23] Hartlib's daughter Mary married the physician and chemist Frederick Clod, or Clodius, referred to as "Doctor Clodius" in the Diary.[24] Another daughter Anna (Nan) married the merchant, writer and preacher Johannes Roder of Utrecht in 1660, despite her lack of a dowry. Samuel Pepys, a guest at the wedding, described it as an occasion of "very great state, cost and noble company".[25] Always the realist, Pepys thought it an excellent match for Nan: "a great fortune for her to light on, she having nothing in the world".[21] Hartlib, having heard a good deal of this kind of gossip, indignantly denied that he had married off his daughter to gain a share of the Roder fortune, but the marriage was certainly advantageous since Roder's father was a rich man, and because Roder, as a prophet/preacher in the Cromwell years, had foretold the "coming of a king". This worked to his advantage after the return of Charles II.[26]
Baconian
Hartlib was indebted to Francis Bacon for a general theory of education that formed common ground for him and Jan Comenius.[27] Hartlib published two studies of Comenius's work: Conatuum Comenianorum praeludia (1637) and Comenii pansophiae prodromus et didactica dissertatio (1639).[8] He also put effort into getting Comenius, of the Protestant Moravian Brethren, to visit England. John Dury and Comenius were Hartlib's two closest correspondents. The latter had the concept of a "tree of knowledge", continually branching out and growing. He also put his own spin on Bacon's ideas. In 1640 he addressed the English Parliament with his Utopian plans involving a new commonwealth and the advancement of learning. Shortly before the English Civil War broke out, John Gauden preached in 1640 to Parliament, recommending that Dury and Comenius be invited to England and naming Hartlib as a likely contact.[28]
Men like Hartlib and Comenius wanted to make the spread of knowledge easier at a time when most knowledge was not categorised or standardised by any widespread conventions or academic disciplines and libraries were mostly private. They wanted to enlighten, educate and improve society, as religious people who saw this as the work of God. Comenius arrived in England in 1641 – bad timing considering that war was imminent. His presence failed to transform the position in education, though substantial literature grew up, particularly on university reform, where Oliver Cromwell set up a new institution. Comenius left in 1642; under Cromwell elementary schooling was expanded from 1646, and Durham College was founded, with staff from Hartlib's associates.[29]
Bacon had formulated a project for a research institute entitled "Salomon's House" in his New Atlantis of 1624. This theoretical scheme was important for Hartlib, who angled during the 1640s for public funding for it. He failed except for a small pension for himself but gathered like-minded others: Dury, John Milton, Kenelm Digby, William Petty, and his son-in-law Frederick Clod (Clodius).[30]
Milton dedicated his 1644 Of Education to Hartlib, whom he had come to know the year before and who had pressed him to publish his educational ideas. But he gave the Comenian agenda short shrift in the work. Barbara Lewalski considers his dismissive attitude as disingenuous, as he had probably used texts by Comenius in his own teaching.[31] Hezekiah Woodward, linked in the minds of Presbyterians and officialdom with Milton as a dangerous writer, was also significant as an educational follower of Comenius and Bacon and a friend of Hartlib.[32]
Hartlib Circle – Royal Society
The "Hartlib circle" of contacts and correspondents, built up from about 1630, was one of the foundations of the Royal Society of London established a generation later. The relationship, however, is not transparent, as Hartlib and his close supporters, with the exception of William Petty, were excluded from the Royal Society when it was set up in 1660.
Economics, agriculture, politics
The utopian Description of the Famous Kingdome of Macaria appeared under Hartlib's name, but is now thought to be by Gabriel Plattes (1600–1655), a friend of his.[33][34] A practical project was to establish a workhouse, as part of the Corporation of the Poor of London. This initiative is thought to have been a major influence on the later philanthropic schemes of John Bellers.[35]
In 1641, Hartlib wrote Relation of that which hath been lately attempted to procure Ecclesiastical Peace among Protestants.[8] After Comenius left England, and in particular from 1646 onwards, the Hartlib group agitated for religious reform and toleration, against the Presbyterian dominance in the Long Parliament. They also proposed economic, technical and agricultural improvements, notably through Sir Cheney Culpeper and Henry Robinson.[36] Benjamin Worsley, Secretary to the Council of Trade from 1650, was a Hartlibian.[37]
Hartlib valued knowledge: anything to raise crop yields or cure disease. Agriculture was a great interest. He worked to spread Dutch farming practices in England, such as the use of nitrogenous crops like cabbage to replenish the nitrogen in the soil and raise the next season's yield. In 1652 he issued a second edition of Richard Weston's Discourse of Flanders Husbandry (1645).[8] Hartlib corresponded with many landowners and academics in his quest for knowledge.
From 1650 Hartlib had an interest in and influence on fruit husbandry. A letter on the subject by Sir Richard Child was published in one of his books: Samuel Hartlib, his Legacy, or an Enlargement of the Discourse of Husbandry used in Brabant and Flanders.[8] Hartlib introduced John Beale, another author on orchards, to John Evelyn, who would eventually write an important work in the field, Sylva (1664).[38] In 1655 Hartlib wrote The Reformed Commonwealth of Bees, featuring a transparent glass beehive to a design by Christopher Wren.[39] Evelyn showed him the manuscript of his Elysium Britannicum, at the end of the 1650s.[40]
Science and medicine
The work of Paracelsus, a 16th-century physician and alchemist who made bold claims for his science, was also one of the inspirations to Hartlib and early chemistry. Hartlib was open-minded, and often tested the ideas and theories of his correspondents. For his own trouble with kidney stones, Hartlib took to drinking diluted sulphuric acid – an intended cure that may have contributed to his death.
Hartlib was interested in theories and practices that modern science would deem irrational, or superstitious – for example, sympathetic medicine, based on the idea that things in nature that bore a resemblance to an ailment could be used to treat it. Hence a plant that looked like a snake might be used to treat snake bites, or a yellow herb to treat jaundice.[41]
Work
- Hartlib's 25,000-plus pages of correspondence and notes appeared on CD in 1995. They are available free of charge on the web.[42]
References
- ^ a b The Galileo Project; M. Greengrass, "Hartlib, Samuel (c. 1600–1662)", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford, UK: OUP, 2004) Retrieved 26 April 2016, pay-walled for date of death.
- ^ Johnson, Mark S.; Stearns, Peter N. (1 September 2022). Education in World History. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1-317-81337-8.
More practically, Samuel Hartlib (c. 1600–1662), of English-Polish origin, but making his career in England, tirelessly promoted the idea of a "new education"..
- ^ a b University of St Andrews. "HARTLIB, SAMUEL [SSNE 6617] - The Scotland, Scandinavia and Northern European Biographical Database". www.st-andrews.ac.uk. Retrieved 1 November 2022.
..son of George Hartlib, a Pole, and Elizabeth Langthon...His maternal grandfather John Langthon was a wealthy English merchant..
- ^ Arved Hübler, Peter Linde and John W. T. Smith, Electronic Publishing '01: 2001 in the Digital Publishing Odyssey (IOS Press, 2001). ISBN 1-58603-191-0
- ^ Hugh Trevor-Roper, From Counter-Reformation to Glorious Revolution (1992), p. 227.
- ^ The Hartlib Papers Project – University of Sheffield
- ^ Eine Vorgeschichte der Internet-Suchmaschine.
- ^ a b c d e f Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 13 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 35–36.
- ^ M. M. Slaughter, Universal Languages and Scientific Taxonomy in the Seventeenth Century (2010), p. 232; Google Books.
- ^ Andrew Pyle (editor), Dictionary of Seventeenth-Century British Philosophers (2000), article Hartlib, Samuel, pp. 393–395.
- ^ He is not mentioned in J. and J. A. Venn's Alumni Cantabrigienses, 10 vols, 1922–1958.
- ^ Greengrass, M. "Hartlib, Samuel". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/12500. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
- ^ Andrew Pyle (editor), The Dictionary of Seventeenth Century British Philosophers (2000), Thoemmes Press (two volumes), article Hartlib, Samuel , p. 393.
- ^ Hugh Trevor-Roper, "Three Foreigners: The Philosophers of the Puritan Revolution", The Crisis of the Seventeenth Century: Religion, the Reformation, and Social Change, Indianapolis, 1967, p. 232.
- ^ Roper 1967, p. 237; Hugh Trevor-Roper, From Counter-Reformation to Glorious Revolution (1992), p. 256.
- ^ Roper 1992, p. 257.
- ^ Ole Peter Grell, Dutch Calvinists in Early Stuart London: The Dutch Church in Austin Friars, 1603–1642 (1989), p. 245.
- ^ Roper 1967, pp. 237–293, especially p. 258.
- ^ Three Foreigners, online text.
- ^ Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). . Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. We may assume that Chisholm relates to The Advice to Hartlib (1647); the other letter may have been the pamphlet on Double Writing (1648).
- ^ a b Pepys's Diary 1 July 1660.
- ^ Lisa Jardine, On a Grander Scale: the outstanding career of Sir Christopher Wren (2002), p. 88.
- ^ Claire Tomalin Samuel Pepys – the Unequalled Self Penguin Books edition, 2003, p. 69.
- ^ Pepys's Diary 17 March 1660.
- ^ Pepys's Diary 10 July 1660.
- ^ See footnote to the Complete Diary of Samuel Pepys, entry for 1 July 1660.
- ^ John Paul Russo, The Future Without a Past: The Humanities in a Technological Society (2005), p. 90.
- ^ Roper 1967, p. 300.
- ^ Roper 1992, p. 225.
- ^ Markku Peltonen, The Cambridge Companion to Bacon (1996), pp. 164–165.
- ^ Barbara Lewalski, The Life of John Milton (2003), pp. 172–173.
- ^ Christopher Hill, Intellectual Origins of the English Revolution (1965), p. 102.
- ^ "Answers - the Most Trusted Place for Answering Life's Questions". Answers.com.
- ^ John L. Brooke, The Refiner's Fire: The Making of Mormon Cosmology, 1644–1844 (1996), p. 20.
- ^ "Introduction | British History Online".
- ^ J. P. Cooper, Social and Economic Policies under the Commonwealth, pp. 125 and 131, in G. E. Aylmer, ed., The Interregnum (1972).
- ^ Christopher Hill, God's Englishman (1972 edition), p. 126.
- ^ Adam Smyth, A Pleasing Sinne: Drink and Conviviality in Seventeenth-century England (2004), pp. 163–165.
- ^ Lisa Jardine, On a Grander Scale: the outstanding career of Sir Christopher Wren (2002), p. 108.
- ^ Therese O'Malley, John Evelyn's "Elysium Britannicum" and European Gardening (1998), p. 143.
- ^ Moss, Kay K. (1999). Southern Folk Medicine, 1750–1820. University of South Carolina Press. p. 224. ISBN 1-57003-289-0.
- ^ The Hartlib Papers
Further reading
- Petty, William (1647). – via Wikisource.
- H. M. Knox. "William Petty's Advice to Samuel Hartlib," British Journal of Educational Studies, Vol. 1, No. 2 (May 1953), pp. 131–142.
External links
- The Hartlib Papers Free to access complete collection of Hartlib's notes, additional materials and pamphlets. Both facsimile images and full text, searchable transcriptions are available.
- Works by or about Samuel Hartlib at the Internet Archive
- The Correspondence of Samuel Hartlib in EMLO
- Samuel Hartlib at The Garden, the Ark, the Tower, and the Temple: Biblical metaphors of knowledge in early modern Europe. Published by the Museum of the History of Science at the University of Oxford.
- New International Encyclopedia. 1905. .
- Dictionary of National Biography. 1885–1900. .
12 Annotations
First Reading
Phil • Link
Father of Samuel Hartlib junior: http://www.pepysdiary.com/encyclo…
S. Spoelstra • Link
I quote from "Dictionary of Seventeenth-Century British Philosophers"
at http://www.thoemmes.com/dictionar…
"Samuel Hartlib was born at Elbing, and educated at the Gymnasium, Brieg, and the University of K
vincent • Link
The Hartlib Papers (second edition)
Samuel Hartlib (c. 1600-62), a great seventeenth-century 'intelligencer' and man of science, set out to record all human knowledge and make it universally available for the education of all mankind. His correspondence, which runs to over 25,000 folios of original materials, came to the University of Sheffield Library in the 1960s. The full-text electronic edition of this correspondence realises Hartlib's vision some 300 years later
http://www.hrionline.ac.uk/hartli…
Pedro • Link
Samuel Hartlib
"Became an important figure in the life of John Evelyn...Sylva put the case for an enlifghtened transformation of the countryside that was no less ambitious that that advanced for the city in Fumifugium. Through its pages thread the utilitarian ideas of Samuel Hartlib, who had died in 1662, sick and disilusioned"
(John Evelyn, Living for Ingenuity by Gillian Darley)
Michael Robinson • Link
Hartlib, his circle and "Biblical metaphors of Knowledge in early modern Europe"
A fascinating exhibition; includes much about people known to Pepys.
http://www.mhs.ox.ac.uk/gatt/
Pedro • Link
From Michael’s site above…
“At the same time, Hartlib and his friends searched for means to prolong and improve human life, in particular through alchemical discovery and the practice of chemical medicine, and strived to achieve dominion over nature through the application of new knowledge and new methods of understanding.”
From Isaac Newton, The Last Sorcerer by Michael White…
The London alchemists of the mid-seventeenth century had centred around Samuel Hartlib, and grew in importance during I640's and I650's and included (amongst others) Robert Boyle, These men operated covertly within the same city as the Royal Society and included many of their number.
The circle aimed to rationalize alchemy by marrying alchemical lore within the interactive framework of mechanical philosophy.
Second Reading
Bill • Link
Samuel Hartlib, son of a Polish merchant, and author of several ingenious works on agriculture, for which he had a pension from Cromwell.
---Diary and correspondence of Samuel Pepys, the diary deciphered by J. Smith. 1854.
Bill • Link
Samuel Hartlib, son of a Polish merchant, and author of several ingenious works on agriculture, for which he received a pension from Cromwell. Milton's "Tractate of Education" is addressed to him. Evelyn describes him in his Diary, November 27th, 1655, as "honest and learned," and calls him "a public-spirited and ingenious person who had propagated many useful things and arts." He lived in Axe Yard about 1661, and had a son named Samuel and a daughter, Nan, who married John Roder or Roth, afterwards knighted. Evelyn says that Claudius, referred to before (see July l0th, 1660, of this Diary), was Hartlib's son-in-law. If so, Hartlib must have had another daughter. He seems to have been in some poverty at the end of his life.
---Wheatley (1896)
Mary Clodius (b. Hartlib): http://www.pepysdiary.com/encyclo…
Frederick Clodius: http://www.pepysdiary.com/encyclo…
Bill • Link
HARTLIB, SAMUEL (d. 1670?), friend of Milton; came to England from Poland, с 1628; introduced writings of Comenius; praised by Milton in treatise on education, 1644; received pension from parliament for works on husbandry, 1646; published pamphlets on education and husbandry, including 'Description of the famous Kingdom of Macaria,' 1641, and 'Discours of Husbandrie used in Brabant and Flanders,' 1652.
---Dictionary of National Biography: Index and Epitome. S. Lee, 1906.
Third Reading
San Diego Sarah • Link
Vincent's link to the Hartlib Papers is dead, but I found the new one:
Samuel Hartlib (1600-62), a great 17th-century 'intelligencer' and man of science, set out to record all human knowledge and make it universally available for the education of all mankind.
His correspondence, which runs to over 25,000 folios of original materials, came to the University [of Sheffield] Library in the 1960s. The full-text electronic edition realises Hartlib's vision some 300 years later.
The project's objective was to create a complete electronic edition with full-text transcription and facsimile images of all 25,000 17th-century manuscripts. ...
This new, online edition provides free access to all the content previouslu available on CD-ROMs.
https://www.dhi.ac.uk/hartlib/
San Diego Sarah • Link
I also found
"PLEASURE, HONOR, AND PROFIT: SAMUEL HARTLIB IN HIS PAPERS, 1620-1662"
by
TIMOTHY E. MILLER Under the Direction of Nicholas Wilding, PhD
A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University 2015
https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cgi/…
Apparently Samuel Hartlib was closely identified with the Puritan regime, so when the Restoration happened, his fellow academics (many of whom founded the Royal Society) focused on their own survival, and Hartlib became an outcast.
After his death, Hartlib’s collection of over 25,000 manuscripts were purchased by his friend, the Royalist Politician William, Viscount Brereton (1631-1680), and taken to the family’s Cheshire estate, Brereton Hall.
His servant, Worthington, “put them into order.” When finished, Worthington stored them in 2 trunks and placed them in a closet. They were later sold by Brereton.
Many of the Papers were intentionally taken out of the collection while they were under Worthington’s care.
Only one of Brereton’s letters remains in the Hartlib Papers.
Brereton’s books were sold in 1697 and there is no reference to Hartlib in the catalogue. Interested parties were given the opportunity by Worthington to take papers out of the Hartlib collection before those papers were sold.
“Seth Ward gave Worthington permission to leave amongst Hartlib’s papers, or to burn, or to bring to him, the letters which he had written to Hartlib; and there is not one of them in the box.”
What happened? Did he burn them or give them to Ward? Others are obviously missing such as all of those letters to and from Nathaniel Ingelo and Milton. Probably most of the dispersals were “innocent,” but some were “probably designed to manipulate the historical record.”
No one knows who bought them, or where the collection was for the next 271 years, when they were retrieved from Birch, Cullimore & Co. of Chester, solicitors for the Delamere family (also of Chester, 20 miles west of Brereton House).
Little is known about the Delameres in relation to the Papers but there was a Delamer House which survived until 1933 when the last George Wilbraham tore it down, which could explain why the papers surfaced when they did.
Also, some correspondence was lost, according to Hartlib, to accidents in his home in 1661 and 1662.
The first incident seems to have been caused by Hartlib’s secretary who “suffered distraction or embezzlement,” and the second by a fire in Hartlib’s study which may have also been the fault of a secretary.
Hartlib wrote, “afflicted in mind by reason of that lamentable fire that broke out in my study.”
There is no way of knowing how many papers were lost.
The papers found at the solicitors are only those which survived the 271 years of storage, during which more of them may have been lost.
San Diego Sarah • Link
PART 2
Hartlib is said to be an invisible man because he disappeared from academic and popular consciousness for most of 300 years.
He also maintains a mysterious quality because so many historians of the 17th century disagree about who and what he was.
He was not a scholar in the traditional sense. He does not appear to have earned a university degree, he held no paid position in the academy, church, or government, and he never published a systematic body of knowledge.
On the other hand, he was educated, founded a school, and was considered an authority by those who had degrees, held positions in the church and government, and published systematic bodies of knowledge.
To bring this invisible man into view, it is important to understand his context; cultural, political, religious, and social, and his person.
And the thesis, which relies heavily on Hartlib's surviving papers, does exactly that.