If it is French that is fractured here, I would suggest the verb foutre, one of the meanings of which can today be translated as to screw. Or f**k if you prefer. In modern French the verb has a very wide variety of meanings, some much more pungent than others.
If it's actually fractured Spanish, I can't be of much help beyond speculating (from context) that there is/was a similar verb and/or usage in Iberia.
Sam isn't masturbating, he's doing exactly what he says - exciting himself sufficiently by simple exercise of concentrated imagination to achieve the same result.
Spoiler alert : On a later occasion he was able to repeat this feat whilst staring at a pretty young woman in church during a Sunday service.
Perhaps not often heard now, but it's not so long ago that one might ask for the reckoning when wanting to pay a restaurant bill. The reckoning is generally the accumulated total of a number of items.
Let's not forget an earlier unofficial "Poet Laureate" John Skelton (1460 - 1529) who earned the title after taking his degree in rhetoric at Cambridge. He was Court Poet to Henry VII and also "scolemaster" to Henry VIII in the king's youth. Sometimes dubbed Helter-Skelter Skelton his verse is written in short, lively lines (Skeltonics) that echo the rhythms of ordinary speech. Great fun.
According to a historian's comment heard recently on BBC Radio4, banning of Christmas feasting arose originally out of a coincidence of dates. During the Commonwealth, it happened that one Christmas Day fell on a Wednesday and Wednesdays were already established as prescribed Fast Days. Thus no Christmas dinner in that particular year - and the more zealous Puritans took this as a precedent that no Christmas Day should be celebrated with feasting in any future year.
I did not catch the name of the historian alleging this origin for the banning, so cannot vouch for it's authenticity, but one can see how it might have evolved in this way, particularly if urged by the Puritan 'great and good'.
Presumably the faggot had no symbolic significance, but was just used to keep breeches and knees from being soiled by the inevitable wet and dirt on the ground in Axe Yard.
Anyone with a keen interest in the history of pockets might wish to try the following: "The Pocket: a hidden history of Women's Lives - 1660 - 1900" by B. Burman and A. Fennetaux. Yale University Press 2020. NYT Art book of the Year.
Good to hear that Elizabeth's cheek is somewhat assuaged this morning. Perhaps it was that poultice that did the trick. As late as the 1940s our family GP prescribed a warm Kaolin poultice for relief from a persistent, chesty cough and it appeared to help.
"neither hath, nor do ........" Pepys demonstrates the the classically taught rhetorical Rule of Three, still in use today in our law courts; "the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth". He was originally a grammar school boy, after all.
"which is the first time I ever sat in a box in my life..."
Perhaps the first time that he ever officially (having paid the full price) sat in a box thus. On the earlier occasion it sounds rather as if he chanced to get carried in as part of a larger group without having set out to do any such thing.
It can happen. My husband and I once got similarly carried in to a Papal address in St. Peter's Square in the Vatican and had to extricate ourselves by ignominiously climbing out over a balustrade before the ceremonies began. We had simply been propelled forwards by other, eager participants in the occasion and assumed by the security personnel to be part of an authorized party.
Was this, I wonder, a 17th century fore-runner of the kind of pop-up food supplier that one can encounter these days, this one making a speciality of roast pork for the duration of Bartholomew Fair?
Comments
Second Reading
About Saturday 9 May 1668
Mary K • Link
The Duchess of Monmouth' injury.
Were they perhaps still dancing the Volta at court?
About Sunday 3 May 1668
Mary K • Link
If it is French that is fractured here, I would suggest the verb foutre, one of the meanings of which can today be translated as to screw. Or f**k if you prefer.
In modern French the verb has a very wide variety of meanings, some much more pungent than others.
If it's actually fractured Spanish, I can't be of much help beyond speculating (from context) that there is/was a similar verb and/or usage in Iberia.
About Tuesday 26 February 1660/61
Mary K • Link
"by strength of fancy"
Sam isn't masturbating, he's doing exactly what he says - exciting himself sufficiently by simple exercise of concentrated imagination to achieve the same result.
Spoiler alert :
On a later occasion he was able to repeat this feat whilst staring at a pretty young woman in church during a Sunday service.
About Tuesday 21 April 1668
Mary K • Link
Reckoning
Perhaps not often heard now, but it's not so long ago that one might ask for the reckoning when wanting to pay a restaurant bill. The reckoning is generally the accumulated total of a number of items.
About Monday 13 April 1668
Mary K • Link
Let's not forget an earlier unofficial "Poet Laureate" John Skelton (1460 - 1529) who earned the title after taking his degree in rhetoric at Cambridge. He was Court Poet to Henry VII and also "scolemaster" to Henry VIII in the king's youth. Sometimes dubbed Helter-Skelter Skelton his verse is written in short, lively lines (Skeltonics) that echo the rhythms of ordinary speech. Great fun.
About Wednesday 25 March 1668
Mary K • Link
Not just "could read" but "should read" I think.
About Saturday 7 March 1667/68
Mary K • Link
Am I misremembering, or has Sam's opinion of Haynes's abilities risen sharply in recent days?
About Did the Puritans ban Christmas dinner?
Mary K • Link
According to a historian's comment heard recently on BBC Radio4, banning of Christmas feasting arose originally out of a coincidence of dates. During the Commonwealth, it happened that one Christmas Day fell on a Wednesday and Wednesdays were already established as prescribed Fast Days. Thus no Christmas dinner in that particular year - and the more zealous Puritans took this as a precedent that no Christmas Day should be celebrated with feasting in any future year.
I did not catch the name of the historian alleging this origin for the banning, so cannot vouch for it's authenticity, but one can see how it might have evolved in this way, particularly if urged by the Puritan 'great and good'.
About Monday 13 January 1667/68
Mary K • Link
Thanks for the tip; the shorter link works well with your guidance.
About Monday 13 January 1667/68
Mary K • Link
I have the same problem as SDS with this link.
About Tuesday 23 April 1661
Mary K • Link
Presumably the faggot had no symbolic significance, but was just used to keep breeches and knees from being soiled by the inevitable wet and dirt on the ground in Axe Yard.
About Monday 30 December 1667
Mary K • Link
John Dolben
Installed as Bishop of Rochester in 1666, where he remained until 1683, when he was translated to York as Archbishop.
About Tuesday 24 December 1667
Mary K • Link
the question of pockets.
Anyone with a keen interest in the history of pockets might wish to try the following:
"The Pocket: a hidden history of Women's Lives - 1660 - 1900" by B. Burman and A. Fennetaux.
Yale University Press 2020.
NYT Art book of the Year.
About Saturday 21 December 1667
Mary K • Link
Good to hear that Elizabeth's cheek is somewhat assuaged this morning. Perhaps it was that poultice that did the trick. As late as the 1940s our family GP prescribed a warm Kaolin poultice for relief from a persistent, chesty cough and it appeared to help.
About Friday 22 November 1667
Mary K • Link
"neither hath, nor do ........"
Pepys demonstrates the the classically taught rhetorical Rule of Three, still in use today in our law courts; "the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth". He was originally a grammar school boy, after all.
About Thursday 7 November 1667
Mary K • Link
Harry R, thank you for the delightful link.
About Saturday 19 October 1667
Mary K • Link
"which is the first time I ever sat in a box in my life..."
Perhaps the first time that he ever officially (having paid the full price) sat in a box thus. On the earlier occasion it sounds rather as if he chanced to get carried in as part of a larger group without having set out to do any such thing.
It can happen. My husband and I once got similarly carried in to a Papal address in St. Peter's Square in the Vatican and had to extricate ourselves by ignominiously climbing out over a balustrade before the ceremonies began. We had simply been propelled forwards by other, eager participants in the occasion and assumed by the security personnel to be part of an authorized party.
About Sunday 8 September 1667
Mary K • Link
compounding with the King
I take this to mean coming to an agreement with the King. i.e. negotiating common ground between opposing ends.
About Wednesday 4 September 1667
Mary K • Link
that private house.
Was this, I wonder, a 17th century fore-runner of the kind of pop-up food supplier that one can encounter these days, this one making a speciality of roast pork for the duration of Bartholomew Fair?
About Tuesday 8 January 1660/61
Mary K • Link
"an indifferent good play"
Perhaps the closest modern equivalent would be a guarded "fairly good play" or "not a bad play" but wronged ......